Home | Reports | Technical Documents | Tech-Blog | One-Shot Gallery | Korea ICT News | About Us | List of Contributors | Become a Contributor |  How to Advertise  
  KT SK Telecom LG U+ Korean Vendors Network Architectures  
Section 5G 4G LTE C-RAN/Fronthaul Gigabit Internet IPTV/Video Streaming IoT SDN/NFV Wi-Fi KT SK Telecom LG U+ Network Protocol Samsung  
CHANNELS HFRFRONTHAUL NetvisionMPTCP Springwave1588 PTP   Korea Communication Review      
Difference between SDN and NFV? Which one is better?
December 12, 2016 | By Nakul Nagralawala @ Alten Calsoft Labs
Online viewer:
Comments (0)

We are pleased to share with you all an interesting article contributed by Nakul Nagralawala who is Qualified Computer Engineer having 2+ years of experience in the business development as well as sales/marketing operations across ITES industry.


Nakul Nagralawala

Business Development Executive at Alten Calsoft Labs



All Articles by Nakul Nagralawala

  How to contribute your article to Netmanias.com !  
  List of Contributors  



Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networks (SDN) are two closely related technologies that often exist together, but not always. So let's understand the basic difference between these two closely related words ---


An SDN can be considered a series of network objects

(such as switches, routers, firewalls) that deploy

in a highly automated manner.


The automation may be achieved by using commercial or open source tools customized according to the administrator's requirements. A full SDN may only cover relatively straightforward networking requirements, such as VLAN and interface provisioning.


In many cases, SDN will also be linked to server virtualization, providing the glue that sticks virtual networks together. This may involve NFV, but not necessarily.


NFV is the process of moving services, such as load balancing,

firewalls and IPS, away from dedicated hardware into a

virtualized environment. This is, of course, part of a wider movement

toward the virtualization of applications and services.


Functions such as caching and content control can easily be migrated to a virtualized environment but won't necessarily provide any significant reduction in operating costs until some intelligence is introduced. This is because a straight physical to virtual, from an operational perspective, achieves little beyond the initial reduction in power and rack-space consumption. Until some dynamic intelligence is introduced with an SDN technology, NFV inherits many of the same constraints as traditional hardware appliance deployments, such as static, administrator-defined and managed policies.


A good example is virtualized application delivery controllers (ADCs). With careful configuration, it is possible to react to the network state and spin up or down application servers as demands rise and fall. However, traditional hardware deployments have been able to do this for a while, and the configuration is very static; it doesn't cater to the scenario where the ADC itself becomes overloaded or an additional application needs to be brought into production quickly. With SDN features driving NFV, several useful things start to happen. The network can react when things need to change at the micro and macro level. An additional instance can be provisioned in a cluster of virtualized ADCs as the load increases, and production applications can easily be cloned and re-deployed in a development environment. The potential is endless.


So it's perfectly possible to have NFV

without the inclusion of a full-blown SDN.

The two are often deployed together, and an SDN that

drives NFV is a very powerful combination.




Neither NFV nor SDN were turnkey solutions earlier -- a great deal of integration and policy design still need to happen. This can become a reality for many enterprises, but the harness is not entirely in place. That said, the tools are rapidly evolving, and many vendors are bringing technologies to market that support SDN or NFV deployments. Ultimately, the implementation of either or both technologies will be driven by the business needs.





Thank you for visiting Netmanias! Please leave your comment if you have a question or suggestion.






Subscribe FREE >>

Currently, 47,000+ subscribed to Netmanias.

  • You can get Netmanias Newsletter

    (New contents, Korea ICT News)

  • You can view all netmanias' contents

  • You can download all netmanias'

    contents in pdf file












SK Telecom's Massive IoT Deployment through LoRa for Small Things



SK Telecom commercialized the world’s first nationwide LoRa-based, IoT dedicated network in the end of June. This report will discuss how well SK Telecom is poised for the emerging IoST sector, and where it is heading.









How to contribute articles to Netmanias!

We always welcome contributed articles. Share your expertise and inspire others!






View All (706)
4.5G (1) 5G (62) AI (2) AR (1) ARP (3) AT&T (1) Akamai (1) Authentication (4) Big Data (2) C-RAN/Fronthaul (17) CDN (4) CPRI (4) Carrier Ethernet (3) China Mobile (2) Cloud (2) CoMP (6) Connected Car (4) DHCP (5) Ericsson (1) FTTH (6) GSLB (1) GiGAtopia (2) Gigabit Internet (19) Google (7) Google Global Cache (3) HLS (5) HSDPA (2) HTTP Adaptive Streaming (5) Handover (1) Huawei (1) IEEE 802.1 (1) IP Routing (7) IPTV (20) IoST (3) IoT (47) KT (40) Korea (18) Korea ICT Market (1) Korea ICT Service (13) Korea ICT Vendor (1) LG U+ (18) LTE (73) LTE-A (16) LTE-B (1) LTE-H (2) LTE-M (3) LTE-U (4) LoRa (7) MPTCP (3) MWC 2015 (8) NB-IoT (6) Netflix (2) Network Protocol (19) Network Slicing (4) New Radio (5) Nokia (1) OSPF (2) OTT (3) PCRF (1) QoS (3) RCS (3) SD-WAN (14) SDN/NFV (54) SK Broadband (2) SK Telecom (33) Samsung (5) Security (11) Self-Driving (1) Small Cell (2) Spectrum Sharing (2) Switching (6) TAU (2) UHD (5) VR (2) Video Streaming (12) VoLTE (8) VoWiFi (2) Wi-Fi (24) YouTube (6) eICIC (1) eMBMS (1) iBeacon (1)
Password confirmation
Please enter your registered comment password.